µo·s¸ÜÃD
¥´¦L

¬Ý¾ú¥v¡A§A·Q¨ì©Î±o¨ì¤F¬Æ»ò¡H(¼È©w)

¤Þ¥Î:
­ì©«¥Ñ moneyismymoney ©ó 13-10-2010 01:02 µoªí ¦³¤H¦P§ÚÁ¿ : ·ÅÁ`­n¤Ï³g¦Ã. §Úµª : ·ÅÁ`«Y  Á¿ ¹L . . . . ­n¤Ï³g¦Ã,¤U­±¦³¤HÅ¥¶Ü ?
¥u¦³¤@­Ó " Á¿ " ¦r, ¥uÅ¥¼Ó±èÅT, ¤£¨£¤HÅé¤F...

TOP

¤Þ¥Î:
­ì©«¥Ñ Kendama ©ó 21-10-2010 01:18 µoªí ¦P·N¡C©_©Ç¦a¡A¤H©Ê (¦pµ½¡B´c) ¸g¹L´X¤d¦~¡A°ò¥»¤W¨S¬Æ§ïÅÜ ...
me too..history is dirty too...

TOP

¤Þ¥Î:
­ì©«¥Ñ Kendama ©ó 26-10-2010 00:03 µoªí History is neutral¡Fpolitics are dirty! 
Politics is part of the history too....

TOP

¤Þ¥Î:
­ì©«¥Ñ Kendama ©ó 26-10-2010 00:18 µoªí History should be an "unbiased" record of historical events including politics? 
yes...but  can historian  really honest to all historical records is another thing ?

 

TOP

µo·s¸ÜÃD